Tag Archives: Agham

Pinoy activists outraged at outcome of Copenhagen climate talks

By the Center for Environmental Concerns, contributor, in Copenhagen, Denmark and Gerry Albert Corpuz, senior reporter, The Pamalakaya Times, in Manila

Copenhagen, Denmark- Climate activists from the Philippines expressed outraged at the Copenhagen Accord signed by 26 heads of states at the summit of the United Nations Conference of Parties 15 (COP15). The group was even more disappointed at the Philippine delegation, headed by President Gloria Arroyo, for being one of the first to sign the undemocratic document and once again selling out the interests and welfare of the Filipino people.

“The Copenhagen Accord, which does not commit the developed countries and biggest polluters to specific emission cuts targes at a specific deadline puts humanity nearer to the brink of world catastrophy. How the accord came to be is a case in point of how rich countries like the US preserve its interests at the expense of the welfare of the world’s population by imposing its power to prevent the creation of a fair, effective and legally binding deal,” said Clemente Bautista of Kalikasan People’s Network for the Environment (Kalikasan PNE).

KALIKASAN-PNE was among the hundreds of civil society organizations that flew to Copenhagen to participate in the talks by forwarding the positions and calls of the country’s most vulnerable and marginalized sectors. While the group did not have high expectations that a binding and substantial agreement will be signed at the UN summit, they were revolted how the talks turned out.

The Copenhagen Accord was brokered by the United States during a closed door meeting last Friday night with the BASIC countries: Brazil, South Africa, India and China, which the other countries left out of the meetings. The process was undemocratic, secretive and in gross violation of the UN charter and the rights of other nations to take part in an agreement where the fate of the world depends on.

The Accord also set the to limit the increase in global temperature to 2°C instead of the 1.5°C needed by countries such as Bangladesh and Tuvalu to stay above sea level. To achieve that, the accord aims to cut global carbon emission by only 50% of 1990 levels by 2050, with no specific target and legally binding commitment from rich countries to reduce their emission.

Aside from the emissions cuts, the accord supposedly commits the developed countries to raise climate funds for vulnerable nations.

Unfair accord

“While we have observed in the past 2 weeks that the climate talks is not a negotiation between equal parties, we have also observed how the Philippine delegation expressed enthusiasm for the unfair accord and contented itself with a few billion pesos of climate aid, ” said Marjorie Pamintuan of Agham Youth.

Ms. Pamintuan also participated in the COP15 with 350.org, an international movement campaigning for the lowering the carbon in the atmosphere to 350ppm.

Referring to an interview of expert negotiator Ms. Bernarditas Castro-Muller, Ms. Pamintuan explained that, “The $30 billion that is to be provided by rich countries for vulnerable nations between 2010 and 2012, and the $100 billion dollars ‘from a wide variety of sources’ to be available after 2020 could hardly be considered any help at all since ‘these will be in the form of loans’ which will bury the Filipinos into much deeper national debt.”

Ms. Pamintuan further pointed out that, “additional national debts means larger budget cuts for services like education and health since a large portion of the national budget is appropriated for debt servicing. With a destroyed environment, unhealthy bodies and without education, what kind of future does the Filipino youth have?”

“Instead of being used to increase the resiliency and adaptive of the country, the $380 million pledge of clean technology and forestry investment funds from the World Bank and Asian Development Bank that Mrs. Arroyo is so proud of will be allocated to hoax technological solutions like clean coal, market based mechanisms and will also facilitate the exploit of our energy and forest resources by foreign corporations,” explained Ms. Meggie Nolasco of Philippine Climate Watch Alliance (PCWA).

According to the PCWA statement , “If the government is indeed serious in addressing climate, instead of promoting technological fixes and false climate solutions it should prioritize people’s needs by immediately scrapping destructive environmental policies like the Mining Act of 1995 and stopping the building of new coal-fired power plants and coal mining projects.”

“While there is already a global consensus that any further delays in coming up with effective solutions will jeopardize the whole planet especially vulnerable nations such as the Philippines, Mrs. Arroyo and her delegation even commended the unfair and unsubstantial deal,” said Ms. Nolasco.

Ms Nolasco added that, “What Mrs. Arroyo and her delegation should have done was act in the interest of the Filipino people by standing firmly with the other nations in demanding that developed countries, especially the US, to commit to an effective, fair and legally binding climate deal.”

“However, we must not be disheartened in our struggle. We must sustain our collective actions even as we go back to our countries and press for true climate change solutions and lasting social justice,” ended Ms. Nolasco.

Not all about aid

In Manila, the militant fisherfolk group Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) on Sunday chided President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo for praising her efforts to secure $ 380-million in financial aid to help the Philippines cope with the impact of climate change.

“Is that how President Arroyo measure the meaning of success? Where is climate justice in the $ 380-million pledges to fight global warming? We don’t call it aid, we call it bribery from top global polluters and environmental destroyers,” Pamalakaya national chair Fernando Hicap said in a press statement.

Hicap said his group was dismayed on President Arroyo over her silence and non-committal and no-combative stance on the collective position of the G-77 for the United States and other major economies of the world to drastically cut their carbon emissions to cushion if not eliminate the phenomenon of global warming across-the-world.

“President Arroyo attended the Copenhagen summit on climate change not to attack the global warmers and present the global people’s agenda for climate justice, but to perform her duty as an apologist for the US and other rich nations,” the Pamalakaya official said.

In her arrival statement, President Arroyo described the Philippines’ efforts to mitigate the effects of climate change as a “life and death’ issue. She said her government is at the frontline of the changing global climate, as she mentioned the past storms that had ravaged the country, the Filipino people and their way of life.

The President said the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank committed up to $ 250 million from their clean technology fund in recognition of the Philippines leadership role in tackling climate changes in Asia. Mrs. Arroyo also took home $ 70 million for forestry investment fund and another 50 million US dollars from the global environmental fund. The Danish government promised another 10 million US dollars in support to the Philippines local water utilities.

Money, money,money

“Mrs. Arroyo works hard for the money for herself and not for climate justice and not for the people affected by US-led inflicted climate change. That’s the President’s vision in life—money, money, enough money for her eternal greed, nothing more, nothing less,” said Hicap.
While President Arroyo was rebuked by Pamalakaya, the militant group commended a group of Filipino activists who made their presence felt during the Conference of Parties (COP) in Copenhagen.

The group praised Clemente Bautista, national coordinator of the environmental group Kalikasan-People’s Network for the Environment and the International League of People’s Struggle (ILPS), Ms Tess Vistro of Amihan peasant women federation, Paul Quintos of Ibon Foundation and Ces Quimpo of Center for Environmental Concerns (CEC) for bringing the Filipino people’s collective position on climate justice and the need to punish top global polluters like the United States and its transnational corporations for bringing global environmental disasters to 77 most poorest countries in the world.

“The Filipino people were not in default in the Copenhagen battle. Their voice was added to the worldwide demands for rich nations to stop exploiting and destroying the people and the resources and to ensure global climate justice against the super profiteering activities of US and other capitalist exploiting nations across America, Europe and Asia and the Pacific,” said Pamalakaya.

Leave a comment

Filed under debt, disaster, environment, foreign relations

GMA, Danding greed behind BNPP revival

GMA, Danding greed behind BNPP revival

The promise of huge kickbacks from the $ 1 billion budget allocation for the re-commissioning of the mothballed Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) is the main reason why President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and business tycoon Eduardo “Danding” Cojuangco through his son Pangasinan Rep. Mark Cojuangco are pushing efforts to revive the controversial project.

“The uncontrollable greed of President Arroyo and Danding Cojuangco is driving motive behind the revival of BNPP. Ms Arroyo and the real Pacman can deny this to high heaven but the $ 1 billion budget for BNPP re-commissioning is something they cannot ignore and just let go,” the left-leaning fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) said in a press statement.

According to Hicap, by design and by standard, top officials of the Macapagal-Arroyo government who are behind the BNPP revival could get as much as 20 percent of the 1 billion US dollar allocation in total commission once the project is started.

“Since that is the policy for brokers, the corrupt officials of the Arroyo government could get as much as 200 million US dollars as direct and indirect commissions from the BNPP revival. On the other hand, Danding’s group will be able to get the lion’s share by taking control of the private operations of BNPP,” the Pamalakaya leader said

Hicap said Cojuangco is the controversial businessman behind the re-commissioning of the controversial plant because his son—Pangasinan Rep. Cojuangco is the principal sponsor of House Bill 4631 that seeks allocation of $ 1 billion for the revival of the BNPP.

“We will not subscribe to any idea that the son is doing it for a crusade. That’s baloney. Danding is Danding and knowing his history, he will get what he wants and his son is a representation of his mindset and interest over the revival of BNPP,” he added.

Pamalakaya added that the re-commissioning of BNPP as enshrined in HB 4631 is part of the long-running political accommodation between the Arroyo clique and the Cojuangco camp since 2001. According to the Pamalakaya leader, the revival of the BNPP is the latest exchange deal between the two camps.

The fisherfolk group noted that HB 4631 is aggressively supported by Pampanga Rep. Juan Miguel Arroyo, also the chair of the House Committee on Energy.

Pamalakaya said the BNPP revival and the possible takeover of Cojuangco of the controversial nuke plant in the near future was presided by the sale of Petron shares to San Miguel Corporation, and by the previous talks between Malacañang and Cojuangco on the disposal and sharing of the P 130-billion coconut levy fund.

The nuclear plant in Morong, Bataan- the current object of outrage by members of the scientific community, ordinary people and anti-corruption watchdogs all over the Philippines was started in 1975 at an estimated cost of $ 600 million.

The plant was completed in 1984 at a cost of $ 2.3 billion, its price bloated by the cronies of the late strongman President Ferdinand Marcos to ensure fat kickbacks for his group and for the ruling presidency at that time.

According to Philippine debt statistics, the Filipino taxpayers had been paying $ 300,000 a day on interest alone for the loan sourced from the Westinghouse under the auspices of and guaranteed by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

It said the debt was not fully paid until 2007, and by then, the Manila government had shelled out a total of P 64.7 B, a third of the interest payments alone. And for all the billions taken out of the Filipino people’s pockets, the country has yet to enjoy a single watt of electricity.

Pamalakaya echoed the statements raised by the science group Agham and the Network Opposed to BNPP Revival (No to BNPP Revival) that the risks in getting the Bataan nuclear power plant online would outweigh the 620 megawatts of electricity it could generate.

Pamalakaya said the projected shortage in 2012 of 3,000 megawatts of electricity can be addressed by building geothermal, hydropower and natural gas, wind and solar power plants even without the operation of the nuke plant in Bataan. It said unused geothermal plants across the country could still generate 750 megawatts of electricity, which are free from grave risks and cheaper sources of power for the 90 million Filipinos. #

Leave a comment

Filed under environment