Tag Archives: CPP

Rebel priest says US aid meant for war

By Gerry Albert Corpuz, http://www.allvoices.com MANILA, Philippines-

Rebel priest Fr. Santiago Salas, spokesperson on the communist led_national Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) in Eastern Visayas said the $ 200 million US Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) grant will bring militarization and human rights violations and not genuine development in the highly militarized island in Eastern Philippines.

Fr. Salas tagged 8th Infantry Division chief Gen. Mario Chan a barefaced liar for denying the sinister agenda of US funded projects currently undertaken in Samar as part of the counter-insurgency program of administration of Philippine President Benigno Simeon Aquino III and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) under the extended Oplan Bantay Laya.

“It is sheer duplicity for Gen. Chan to deny Samar’s militarization,” the NDFP-Eastern Visayas spokesperson said in a press statement, a copy of which was sent to http://www.allvoices.com. Salas added: “Victims of human rights violations have publicly denounced widepread and extended military operations since August in Jiabong, Motiong, San Jorge, Catbalogan, Gandara, Paranas, San Jose de Buan and Matuguinao in Western Samar, as well as several adjacent towns in Northern and Eastern Samar.

The rebel priest said it only shows the Aquino government is enamored with the militarist solution and Gen. Chan is implementing this by militarizing Samar.He said is already clear the present government is dragging its feet in the peace process with the NDFP, extending the widely condemned (national security program) Oplan Bantay Laya until January 2011, and carrying out the US Counterinsurgency Guide in plotting its own counterrevolutionary war.


The NDFP-EV spokesperson also rebuked Gen. Chan for maliciously accusing the revolutionary movement of being against development in opposing the US-funded Samar Road project.

“Without basic socio-economic reforms, the MCC project will be a mere publicity and psywar gimmick to glamorize the Aquino government and to justify militarization in the name of securing this project,” Fr. Salas said. The NDFP-Eastern Visayas maintains that to assure genuine economic development, land reform and national industrialization are needed.

But Samar reflects the backwardness and imbalance under semifeudalism in Eastern Visayas.The democratic front argued the crops planted do not benefit the people and over 60% goes to commercial crops for export such as coconut and abaca, while less than 20% is left for rice and other basic foodstuffs.The agricultural conditions are also dire in Eastern Visayas with the number of irrigated rice fields is drastically declining, farmlands continue to be divided into smaller and less productive parcels, and the use of agricultural machinery or even farm animals is woefully inadequate.

“Such is the explosive situation where the peasants are becoming increasingly landless, desperate and hungry,” the NDFP-EV added.Meanwhile, other economic activities such as mining and logging have not resulted in industrialization but the plunder of the island’s rich natural resources as raw materials for export.”Thus it is Gen. Chan who is against development, for pushing a project that will not solve the island’s economic ills, but will hasten the exploitation and oppression of the people,” the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP)-led NDFP-EV added.

Bureaucratic loot

The NDFP-EV likewise charged Gen. Chan of hustling for the US-funded project in his greed to ensure his share from the bureaucratic loot.

“The NDFP-EV is aware that civilian contractors in Samar have been complaining in recent years that they are being muscled out by the 8th ID in construction projects,” it said. ” High-ranking military officials not only back certain contractors to share the kickbacks, but also use the army engineering battalions to grab corruption-tainted projects that should have been done by the civilian government,” the NDFP-EV asserted.
“Isn’t it strange otherwise why Gen. Mario Chan makes vulgar demands to the local government to rush the US-funded project, when he is out of line in doing so, as a military official who should be subordinate to civilian authority?” it asked.

Oppose MCC in EV

The NDFP-EV spokesperson called on the people to express their grievances and expose the real situation in opposing the US Millennium Challenge Corporation project.

“We call on the peasantry and the people to press the demands for land reform and national industrialization against a grandiloquent but deceptive project. We call on the Church and the human rights and peace activists to expose and oppose the ‘counterinsurgency’ scheme behind the MCC project based on the US COIN Guide,” Salas said. The NDFP spokesperson also rallied anti-corruption activists to study and criticize the US-funded project that will surely be undertaken by the same thieves responsible for the neglected state of Samar’s roads and other public works.

Leave a comment

Filed under foreign relations, peace talks, US intervention

Philippine guerillas deny using children in war

By Gerry Albert Corpuz in Manila and Billy Javier Reyes in Tacloban City

MANILA, Philippines- The communist led National Democratic Front of the Philippines in Eastern Visayas (NDFP-Eastern Visayas on Thursday issued a categorical statement denying accusations by the Philippine military that the Maoist guerillas waging a 40-year old people’s protracted war against the Manila government were abusing children to advance their revolutionary cause.

In a press statement sent to http://www.allvoices.com, NDFP-Eastern Samar spokesperson Fr. Santiago Salas said it is the Armed Foces of the Philippines (AFP) which has concrete cases of abusing children in situations of armed conflict in the Philippines.

Fr. Salas said he issued the statement to correct the malicious news in a national daily which mistated the facts of a United Nations report, making it appear that the communist guerillas were using child combatants, though it was never said so.

“In the said UN report, it is in fact the AFP that is cited for documented cases of abusing children in situations of armed conflict. The NDFP-Eastern Visayas can further shed light on the matter because the 8th Infantry Division has
well-publicized cases on the matter in Eastern Visayas,” Salas stressed.

Fr. Salas said that the Government of the Republic of the Philippines
continues to keep 17-year-old Michelle Adelantar in custody through
the Department of Social Welfare and Development after her illegal
arrest and detention by the 8th Infrantry Division of the Philippine

“Michelle was abducted and detained last February 3 in San Jose de
Buan, Western Samar by the 34th Infantry Battalion, merely because she
was the child of members of the Communist Party of the Philippines and
the New People’s Army. She still remains in DSWD custody with the
complicity of the 8th ID even though she has civilian relatives who
are ready and willing to take her in and have in fact long demanded
her release,” the NDFP said.

NDFP-Visayas said Col. Armand Rico, 8th ID spokesperson, recently stated over the 8th ID radio program he handles, the reason why the military wants
Michelle detained.

‘Her parents are NPA members, her siblings are NPA members.’ This is unjust, illegitimate, arrogant and mean. This, as well as other statements by Col. Rico, serve as evidence of the AFP’s violations of the rights of children in the armed conflict with the NDFP,” the NDFP statement added.

Fr. Salas recalled that another damning case of the AFP’s child abuse is that of Joel “Dayucdoc” Silvestre, a mentally-handicapped 13-year-old from Brgy. Montalban, Matuguinao, Western Samar who was claimed by the 8th ID to be an NPA child combatant in June 2009.

“The GRP blatantly violated Joel’s rights: soldiers took advantage of
his mental handicap and tricked him so he could be taken into custody.
The military then used Joel as a guide in their military operations;
he was given a firearm and made to identify alleged NPA supporters in
his community who were then interrogated and tortured,” the NDFP-Eastern Visayas added.

The group also said the 8th ID and DSWD also presented Joel to the media, divulging his real name and allowing photos and videos of him to be taken. The NDF said aside from the ordeal they imposed on Joel, other innocent people also suffered and the public victimized with deception because of the
military’s stupid and vicious machinations.

Fr. Salas also called for justice for Michelle, Joel and other
victims of human rights violations under the military’s Oplan Bantay

“The NDFP-Eastern Visayas reminds the GRP that it will definitely be brought to
account for violating the rights of Michelle Adelantar and Joel
“Dayucdoc” Silvestre, which are well-documented and with many
witnesses to attest the truth,” it said.

“We demand the immediate release of Michelle Adelantar. We demand
justice for the victims of Oplan Bantay Laya. We demand the arrest,
trial and punishment of the outgoing president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo
for widespread and gross human rights violations under Oplan Bantay
Laya and other crimes against the people,” the NDFP-Eastern Visayas added.

Meanwhile, leading presidential candidate Sen. Benigno Simeon “Noynoy” Aquino III remains hesistant to snowballing demand of peace advocates in Manila to resume the stalled talks between the NDFP and the government peace panel.

In a separate statement, the leftist fisherfolk alliance Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) said the presumptive president elect Aquino was not in poltiical mood to talk peace with the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), its armed wing the New People’s Army (NPA) and the NDF.

Pamalakaya chairperson Fernando Hicap believed Sen.Aquino was not really sincere in promoting peace all over the country and he will continue what were prescribed before by powerful military officials in the AFP, which were in accordance with the militaist program of Washington D.C government under the administration of US President Barack Obama. #

Leave a comment

Filed under human rights, peace talks, politics

EU court to decide Joma’s case vs. terror blacklist

EU court to decide Joma’s case vs. terror blacklist

Utrecht, The Netherlands- The European Court of First Instance (ECFI) will issue in Luxembourg on 30 September its judgment on Case T-341/07 of Prof. Jose Maria Sison versus the Council of the European Union (EU), in which he complains against the maintenance of his name in the EU terrorist blacklist and
demands the removal of his name from said list.

In a statement sent by the International Committee DEFEND Filipino progressives in Europe, it says, “the crucial point against the Council of the European Union is that it has unjustly maintained Prof. Sison in the so-called terrorist blacklist without any concrete evidence against him for any specific act of terrorism.”

According to DEFEND, previously, the European court issued a court judgment on 11 July 2007 in favor of Prof. Sison, ordering the Council of the EU to annul its decision to blacklist Prof. Sison and declaring the Council as having infringed Prof. Sison’s rights of defense, the obligation to state reasons and the right to effective judicial protection.

But before the issuance of the court judgment, the Council of the EU put again the name of Prof. Sison in its blacklist on 28 June 2007, thus prompting him to file a new complaint before the European Court demand his removal from the so-called terrorist blacklist on the ground that the Council has infringed the following: 1) the obligation to state reasons and make a truthful assessment, 2) Article 2 (3) of Regulation No. 2580/2001 and Article 1 (4) of Common Position 2001/931, 3) the
principle of proportionality and 4) the general principles of Community law and fundamental rights.

The International DEFEND Committee is confident that Prof. Sison will win his case again because of the previous judgment of the ECFI in favor of Prof. Sison in 2007 and the dropping of the false charges of murder against him in The Netherlands last 31 March 2009. The Dutch prosecution service failed to establish any criminal offense of Prof. Sison.

Nicholas James Forwood is the presiding judge of the court in Case T-341/07 of Prof. Jose Maria Sison versus the Council of the EU. According to E. Coulon, the registrar of the court, the ECFI judgment shall be read at 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 in one of the ECFI courtrooms at Kirchberg, Luxembourg, Rue du Fort Niedergrunewald L-2925.

Prof. Sison is represented by Jan Fermon as lead lawyer, the German lawyers Eberhard Schultz and Wolfgang Kaleck, the Filipino lawyer Romeo T. Capulong, the French lawyer Antoine Comte and Dutch lawyer Dundar Gurses. The International DEFEND Committee provides moral and material support to Prof. Jose Maria Sison.

Journalists are advised to seek entry to the courtroom at the reception desk of the ECFI 15 minutes before the session. They can interview briefly Prof. Jose Maria Sison and his lead counsel, Jan Fermon, outside of the courtroom immediately after the issuance of the decision.

According to Ms Ruth de Leon, International Committee DEFEND pointperson in Europe, in the final oral hearing of the Sison complaint against the EU terrorist blacklist last 30 April 2009, the presiding judge took special note of the fact that Prof. Sison had never been prosecuted in The Netherlands for any specific act of terrorism. The lawyer of the Dutch government as intervener in the case also admitted that the previous dropping of the murder charges against him by the Dutch prosecution was a new element to be taken into account.

“The false charges of inciting the killing of Philippine military agents was terminated by the Dutch prosecution service last 31 March 2009 due to lack of evidence, as had been ruled previously in judgments of Dutch judicial authorities (district court of The Hague, appellate court and the examining judge),” she said.

De leon further stressed the aforesaid termination of prosecution is relevant to the case before the European court. It shows the lack of concrete evidence for the allegation that Prof. Sison is Armando Liwanag or chairman of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) as well as for the allegation that he is culpable for any violent act of the New People’s Army, despite the close collaboration of Dutch and Philippine political authorities for several years in trying to criminalize him.

“The Council has continuously failed to cite any decision of any
competent national judicial authority to prove Prof. Sison’s involvement in any specific act of terrorism. In desperation, the Council has misrepresented as decisions on Prof. Sison’s culpability for terrorism the Dutch court decisions on his application for political asylum in the 1990s and the recent Dutch court decisions on the false charges of inciting murder,” she said.

De leon added: “In fact, the Dutch Council of State in 1992 and 1995 and the Dutch Law Uniformity Chamber in 1997 ruled that Prof. Sison is a political refugee under Article 1 A of the Refugee Convention because he has no criminal liability as to disqualify him from being recognized as such.”

She said the District Court of The Hague and the Appellate Court in 2007 ruled that there is no sufficient evidence against him for the incitation of murder. The passing statement that there are indications or clues that he plays a prominent role in the CPP does not mean culpability for any criminal act of terrorism.

Jan Fermon, lead counsel of Prof. Sison, sharply criticized the of the EU and the Dutch government for misrepresenting judgments of the District Court of the Hague on 13 September 2007 and the Dutch Appeal Court on 3 October 2007 on false murder charges against Prof. Sison as judgments condemning him for terrorism. In fact the court decisions released Prof. Sison from detention on the ground of insufficent evidence for the charges of inciting murder.

The so-called terrorist blacklisting of the CPP and NPA by the US, EU and other foreign governments is completely anomalous because under Philippine law the CPP is already legal by virtue of the repeal of the Anti-Subversion Law in 1992 and because under Philippine law the acts of revolutionary armed struggle by the NPA against military targets are deemed as acts of rebellion and under international laws of war as acts of belligerency in a civil war.

On the basis of the Marty report and recommendations, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has condemned EU blacklisting procedures as violative of human rights. Legal experts and human rights organizations have cited the case of Prof. Sison to express outrage over the violation of his fundamental rights.

Since being blacklisted as terrorist by the US, Dutch and other
governments in August 2002, Prof. Sison has been actually subjected to punitive measures for more than seven years under the pretext of temporary administrative restrictive measures. Civil death is imposed him as he is prohibited from having legal residence, earning an income, receiving a living allowance, holding a house, having sufficient insurance coverage, receiving old age pension and travelling freely.

By being merely blacklisted as a “terrorist”, Prof. Sison has
suffered a fate worse than that of a criminal convicted for murder or even the prime suspects in 9-11 who are assured of their essential needs by UN Security Council resolution 1452. Until now, the Dutch Finance Minister prohibits Prof. Sison from having financial transaction of any kind and from receiving any social payment for his essential human needs. Friends
are outraged by the inhumanity of the EU and the Dutch government and lend Prof. Sison the resources for his subsistence and legal expenses.###

Leave a comment

Filed under human rights, peace talks, politics